Sigh! I hate when this happens, but it happens from time to time, unfortunately. Now and again I will come across a book which I really want to read, but I can't. For whatever reason, I can't get into it. Whenever this has happened in the past, I've never really been able to pin down the reason for my inability to read certain books. Take the third book in C. S. Lewis's
Space Trilogy, for example. It's called
That Hideous Strength
and I've heard that Lewis made connections in this to the King Arthur mythology (one of my absolute favourite mythologies), and yet for years now I've not been able to finish Lewis's book. Whenever this has happened in the past and I've finally surmounted whatever obstacle was blocking my ability to read a certain book, it was always followed with a certain "why the hell did I ever have difficulty reading that?" And, more often than not, the book in question ended up being one of the best books I've ever read. Will that be the case with China Miéville's
Perdido Street Station
? I don't know. We shall see . . . eventually.
So, for the time being, I've put Miéville's book down and have moved on to read Ann & Jeff Vandermeer's
The New Weird
. This is an anthology, both of short stories, as well as of discussions (including online discussions) of a genre of fiction that came to be called the New Weird. I've already read the intro to this, and here are the opening paragraphs, which I think are very interesting, given the book I've just set aside . . .
ORIGINS
The "New Weird" existed long before 2003, when M. John Harrison started a message board thread with the words: "The New Weird. Who does it? What is it? Is it even anything?" For this reason, and this reason only, it continues to exist even now, even after a number of critics, reviewers, and writers have distanced themselves from the term.
By 2003, readers and writers had become aware of a change in perception and a change in approach within genre. Crystallized by the popularity of China Miéville's Perdido Street Station†, this change had to do with finally acknowledging a shift in The Weird.
Weird fiction—typified by magazines like Weird Tales and writers like H. P. Lovecraft or Clark Ashton Smith back in the glory days of the pulps—eventually morphed into modern-day traditional Horror. "Weird" refers to the sometimes supernatural or fantastical element of unease in many of these stories—an element that could take a blunt, literal form or more subtle and symbolic form and which was, as in the best of Lovecraft's work, combined with a visionary sensibility. These types of stories also often rose above their pulp or self-taught origins through the strength of the writer's imagination. (There are definite parallels to be drawn between certain kinds of pulp fiction and so-called "Outsider Art.")
Two impulses or influences distinguish the New Weird from the "Old" Weird, and make the term more concrete than terms like "slipstream" and "interstitial," which have no distinct lineage. The New Wave of the 1960s was the first stimulus leading to the New Weird. Featuring authors such as M. John Harrison, Michael Moorcock, and J. G. Ballard, the New Wave deliriously mixed genres, high and low art, and engaged in formal experimentation, often typified by a distinctly political point of view. New Wave writers also often blurred the line between science fiction and fantasy, writing a kind of updated "scifantasy," first popularized by Jack Vance in his Dying Earth novels. This movement (backed by two of its own influences, Mervyn Peake and the Decadents of the late 1800s) provided what might be thought of as the brain of the New Weird.
The second stimulous came from the unsettling grotesquery of such seminal 1980s work as Clive Barker's Books of Blood. In this kind of fiction, body transformations and dislocations create a visceral, contemporary take on the kind of visionary horror best exemplified by the work of Lovecraft—while moving past Lovecraft's coyness in recounting events in which the monster or horror can never fully be revealed or explained. In many of Barker's best tales, the starting point is the acceptance of a monster or transformation and the story is what comes after. Transgressive horror, then, repurposed to focus on monsters and grotesquery but not the "scare," forms the beating heart of the New Weird.
In a sense, the simultaneous understanding of and rejection of Old Weird, hardwired to the stimuli of the New Wave and New Horror, gave many of the writers identified as New Weird the signs and symbols needed to both forge ahead into the unknown and create their own unique re-combinations of familiar elements.
—THE NEW WEIRD. Vandermeer, Ann & Jeff. Tachyon Publications: San Francisco (2008), pp. ix-x.
The connection between this book and Miéville's is undeniable. In fact, Miéville's short story, "Jack," which is also placed in the same world as
Perdido Street Station, is one of the short stories anthologized in this book. The odd thing is, I didn't have this problem with Miéville's book
King Rat, but that book was pretty much naught more than a strange and weird retelling of
The Pied Piper of Hamelin (which version you accept, that of the Brothers Grimm or of the poem by Robert Browning, doesn't matter).
Going off-topic, I've been giving thought to further modifications to the appearance of this blog. The idea I have in mind involves a modification to the background 'paper' on which the text appears (not the background 'paper' that surrounds it). It'll take some work, so it may be sometime before you see it (assuming that I'm successful with the modification and that I like the result enough to use it). Nonetheless, I wanted to make my readers aware of the possibility of an upcoming change.
_____
† Perhaps it's because
Perdido Street Station is the nexus of the acknowledgement of the paradigm shift to which the Vandermeers refer that I'm unable to read this book at the moment. ~shrugs~
Labels: Ann Vandermeer, Jeff Vandermeer, What I'm Reading, What I'm Reading (2009)